Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 21 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Wrangler consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 43 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 347 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 1002 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`400 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi Q5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |