Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 246 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 107 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 154 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 11.6 | |
|
The Jeep Wrangler is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Wrangler over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.7 engine: A robust and reliable engine.
Automatic transmission versions may experience increased vibration at idle. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1059 litres | 1934 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 73 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 875 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`546 kg | 2`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`960 kg | 2`095 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 586 kg | 755 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 44 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |