Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 104 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.3 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Wrangler consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 255 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Wrangler consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Wrangler gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 73 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1059 litres | 516 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Jeep Wrangler has 364 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 543 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`546 kg | 1`890 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`960 kg | 1`536 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 586 kg | 354 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Therefore, Jeep Wrangler is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |