Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Mercedes ML 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 270 HP | 306 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Jeep Wrangler engine produces 36 HP less power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 78 litres | |
650 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 897 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`900 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 48 200 | 18 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |