Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 20 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Wrangler consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Wrangler could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 251 mm (9.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 548 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1059 litres | 1731 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 125 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 672 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.8 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`546 kg | 2`470 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`960 kg | 1`804 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 586 kg | 666 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Velar scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |