Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Wrangler engine produces 22 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 81 litres | 77 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 897 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 113 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The Land Rover Range Rover Sport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 52 600 | 39 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |