Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Pajero can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Pajero also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 2.5 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 199 HP | 115 - 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 240 - 381 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 11.2 seconds | 10 - 17.1 seconds | |
| In general, Jeep Wrangler are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Pajero. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 11.6 | 9.2 - 13.4 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 14 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 141 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 274 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`374 | ~ 2`694 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |