Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jeep Wrangler
2002 - 2007
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.4 - 4.0 (petrol)2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Pajero is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 143 - 177 HP100 - 202 HP
Torque: 215 - 296 NM240 - 373 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 - 13 seconds10 - 17.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.4 - 14.59.5 - 14.2
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.95 m4.28 m
Width: 1.68 m1.87 m
Height: 1.76 m1.84 m
Jeep Wrangler is smaller.
Jeep Wrangler is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1303 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`032~ 2`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 94003800
Pros and Cons: Jeep Wrangler has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv