Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Pajero is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 - 177 HP | 100 - 202 HP | |
Torque: | 215 - 296 NM | 240 - 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13 seconds | 10 - 17.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 14.5 | 9.5 - 14.2 | |
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.95 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1303 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`032 | ~ 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 9400 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |