Jeep Wrangler 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 177 HP | 115 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 - 296 NM | 240 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 13 seconds | 11.5 - 17.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 - 14.5 | 9.1 - 13.8 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.95 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 36 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1303 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`032 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |