Jeep Wrangler 1996 vs Suzuki Vitara 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 - 177 HP | 71 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 296 NM | 127 - 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 14.1 seconds | 12.5 - 19.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 - 14.7 | 7.8 - 10.9 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 14 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1565 litres | 1300 litres | |
| Jeep Wrangler has 260 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.8 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |