Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.4 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 184 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 290 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 14.8 seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 - 15.5 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 83 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 1350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1223 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 996 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 1377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`950 | ~ 3`073 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |