Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.8 - 4.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 184 HP | 91 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 290 NM | 188 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 14.8 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 - 15.5 | 11.2 - 17.8 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 96 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 832 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1223 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 478 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`950 | ~ 2`993 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |