Jeep Wrangler 1987 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Blazer can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Blazer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 4.0 | 2.2 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 - 184 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 - 290 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 14.8 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 - 15.5 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 74 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Blazer, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1223 litres | 1920 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 1549 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Blazer (by 697 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`950 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |