Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 3.0 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 199 HP | 165 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 261 - 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 13.8 | 8.7 - 13.5 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.85 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`481 | ~ 3`024 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |