Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 2.4 - 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 199 HP | 147 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 224 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 13.8 | 9.9 - 14.6 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, a Jeep Wrangler with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Wrangler is 25 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.35 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`481 | ~ 2`784 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |