Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.0 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Jeep Wrangler is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 199 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 450 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 13.8 | 8.7 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.35 metres more than that of the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`481 | ~ 2`913 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |