Jeep Wrangler 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Wrangler is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 | 3.6 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 199 HP | 272 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 13.8 | 9.4 - 14.9 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 22 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2322 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.25 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.25 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`481 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |