Jeep Wrangler 2023 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Wrangler is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.4 (petrol, hybrid) | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Land Rover Range Rover is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 481 HP | 249 - 615 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 500 - 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 7.6 seconds | 4.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jeep Wrangler. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 - 11.4 | 0.8 - 11.9 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 242 - 282 mm (9.5 - 11.1 inches) | 284 - 295 mm (11.2 - 11.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 818 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2050 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 209 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`696 kg | ~ 3`453 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`134 kg | ~ 2`558 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 562 kg | ~ 895 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 59 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |