Jeep Wrangler 2012 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 198 - 285 HP | 106 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 410 NM | 145 - 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.8 seconds | 11 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 12.3 | 8.2 - 9.2 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 516 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 302 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The Suzuki Grand Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`563 | ~ 1`863 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |