Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 - 285 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 400 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Honda CR-V are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jeep Wrangler. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 - 12.4 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 246 mm (9.7 inches) | 155 - 208 mm (6.1 - 8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 35 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 897 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Wrangler has 400 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 940 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`208 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |