Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Honda CR-V 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 1.5 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 285 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 450 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.6 seconds | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Jeep Wrangler are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 12.4 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 246 - 260 mm (9.7 - 10.2 inches) | 155 - 208 mm (6.1 - 8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Wrangler is 31 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1110 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 294 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 602 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`410 kg | ~ 2`208 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`893 kg | ~ 1`618 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 517 kg | ~ 590 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Honda CR-V scores higher in safety tests. The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |