Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeep Wrangler is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Land Rover Defender is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 2.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 285 HP | 200 - 525 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 450 NM | 400 - 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.6 seconds | 5.2 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Defender are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jeep Wrangler. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 12.4 | 7.6 - 14.5 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Defender. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 246 - 260 mm (9.7 - 10.2 inches) | 226 - 295 mm (8.9 - 11.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller. Jeep Wrangler is 23 cm shorter than the Land Rover Defender, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 1355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1563 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 1152 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Defender. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 1055 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`410 kg | ~ 2`986 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`893 kg | ~ 2`227 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 517 kg | ~ 759 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 47 procentiem less than Land Rover Defender. Therefore, Land Rover Defender is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Defender scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Defender scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 58 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |