Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi Q5 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Audi Q5 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 285 HP | 150 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 450 NM | 320 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 9.6 seconds | 5.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 12.4 | 5.2 - 7.1 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q5. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is smaller, but higher. Jeep Wrangler is 39 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 203 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
508 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Jeep Wrangler has 347 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 1042 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Jeep Wrangler can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`410 kg | ~ 2`480 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`893 kg | ~ 1`825 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 517 kg | ~ 655 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Audi Q5. Therefore, Audi Q5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi Q5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |