Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Jeep Wrangler is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 470 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 246 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 10.3 seconds | 9.7 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Jeep Wrangler are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Land Cruiser. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 16.8 | 7.4 - 11.7 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 242 - 274 mm (9.5 - 10.8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Wrangler is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 784 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1909 litres | 1934 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`668 kg | ~ 2`916 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`145 kg | ~ 2`130 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 523 kg | ~ 786 kg | |
| Jeep Wrangler load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 50 procentiem less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 44 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |