Jeep Wrangler 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Wrangler is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.4 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 - 470 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 - 637 NM | 240 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 10.3 seconds | 9.4 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 16.8 | 4.9 - 6.2 | |
|
Jeep Wrangler petrol engines consumes on average 7.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Jeep Wrangler equipped with diesel engines consume 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 242 - 274 mm (9.5 - 10.8 inches) | 204 - 210 mm (8 - 8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Wrangler is larger. Jeep Wrangler is 12 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Wrangler is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 898 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage capacity. Jeep Wrangler has 348 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Wrangler (by 68 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Wrangler is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Wrangler can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`767 | ~ 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 48 200 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Wrangler has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |