Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 53 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Suzuki SX4. Thanks to more power Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Renegade could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Renegade has 4x4: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.59 m | |
| Jeep Renegade is 5 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1269 litres | |
| Jeep Renegade has 79 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Renegade (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.7 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki SX4 scores higher in safety tests, butJeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Suzuki SX4 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |