Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 48 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Thanks to more power Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Yeti is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Renegade could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Renegade has 4x4: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Renegade is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1297 litres | 1665 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Renegade uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 368 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`010 kg | 1`955 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |