Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Renegade engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mazda CX-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Renegade has 4x4: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.55 m | |
| Jeep Renegade is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Jeep Renegade has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Renegade (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Renegade scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |