Jeep Renegade 2018 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Hybrid | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Jeep Renegade) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Skoda Yeti) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 45 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 95 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Despite less power, Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.0 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 11.60 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 36 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1800 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Renegade gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Renegade has 4x4: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Renegade is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1665 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Renegade has 75 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. This could mean that the Jeep Renegade uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 388 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`315 | 1`904 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |