Jeep Renegade 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Hybrid | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 70 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, but torque is 65 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Despite less power, Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.0 | 5.5 | |
The Jeep Renegade is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Renegade consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Jeep Renegade over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 36 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1800 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
Jeep Renegade gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Jeep Renegade has 4x4: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
Jeep Renegade is smaller, but higher. Jeep Renegade is 21 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 472 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1277 litres | 1478 litres | |
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Jeep Renegade has 142 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 201 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`315 | 1`903 | |
Safety: | |||
Renault Kadjar scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 19 200 | 11 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |