Jeep Renegade 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Renegade could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2018: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. Renault Kadjar 2015: Kadjar has an automatic four-wheel drive system with three modes: 2WD, AUTO and LOCK. In 2WD and AUTO modes, it`s a front-wheel drive vehicle under normal conditions. In AUTO mode, if wheel spin is detected, up to 50% of torque can be sent to the rear wheels. In LOCK mode, the center differential is engaged to provide a preset 50/50 power distribution between the front and rear axles. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Jeep Renegade is smaller, but higher. Jeep Renegade is 21 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Jeep Renegade has 121 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 181 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kadjar scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |