Jeep Renegade 2018 vs Nissan Juke 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Renegade engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Juke. Despite the higher power, Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Renegade could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jeep Renegade is larger. Jeep Renegade is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Renegade is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | 1305 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Renegade has 71 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. This could mean that the Jeep Renegade uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 8 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Jeep Renegade can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |
