Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Renegade engine produces 20 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 70 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Jeep Renegade reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Renegade is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Renegade consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Jeep Renegade over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Renegade consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Renegade is smaller. Jeep Renegade is 25 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Jeep Renegade has 54 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |