Jeep Renegade 2014 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 185 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 350 NM | 340 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.8 seconds | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 9.4 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Jeep Renegade petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. On average, Jeep Renegade equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Renegade is smaller. Jeep Renegade is 25 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Renegade is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 351 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1297 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Jeep Renegade has 54 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Renegade is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`976 | ~ 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Renegade has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |