Jeep Patriot 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Jeep Patriot engine produces 16 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Patriot consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Patriot could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Patriot 2007: Patriot has Freedom Drive I - electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car is front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is not designed for off-road use, but mainly for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Patriot might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Patriot is 5 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Patriot is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1777 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage capacity. Jeep Patriot has 66 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Patriot has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |