Jeep Patriot 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Patriot engine produces 22 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 59 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
| Jeep Patriot is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Patriot is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1777 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Patriot has 250 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Patriot has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |