Jeep Patriot 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Patriot engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Jeep Patriot reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Patriot consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Patriot could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Patriot engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Journey, Dodge Caliber | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jeep Patriot is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Patriot is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1777 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage capacity. Jeep Patriot has 77 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Patriot has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |