Jeep Patriot 2007 vs BMW X1 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Patriot engine produces 50 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 90 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Jeep Patriot reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.9 | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Patriot consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Patriot could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2015: This generation BMW has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive system which sends 100% of the torque to the front wheels by default. The system analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when needed. When wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Patriot engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge Journey, Dodge Caliber | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jeep Patriot is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Patriot is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Patriot is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1777 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Patriot has 147 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 227 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Patriot has
|
BMW X1 has
| |