Jeep Patriot 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 174 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 - 310 NM | 176 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 11 seconds | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 8.8 | 7.5 - 10.6 | |
|
Jeep Patriot petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Jeep Patriot equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Patriot is smaller. Jeep Patriot is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Patriot is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 652 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1777 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Patriot has 111 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Patriot (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`945 | ~ 2`331 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Patriot has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |