Jeep Compass 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 770 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1693 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |