Jeep Compass 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, but torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 521 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |