Jeep Compass 2017 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 30 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.85 m | |
| Jeep Compass and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |