Jeep Compass 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Compass consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Jeep Compass is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 117 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |