Jeep Compass 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Ford Kuga is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford Kuga. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.2 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1603 litres | |
| Jeep Compass has 2 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Kuga has
| |