Jeep Compass 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Compass) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-30) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass engine produces 48 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 167 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.56 m | |
| Jeep Compass and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1406 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage capacity. Jeep Compass has 28 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`021 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
| |