Jeep Compass 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass and Ford Kuga have the same engine power, but Jeep Compass torque is 50 NM more than Ford Kuga. Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 1360 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1603 litres | |
| Jeep Compass has 2 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |