Jeep Compass 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Compass) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Kuga) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 80 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1360 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Compass is smaller. Jeep Compass is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 456 litres | |
| Jeep Compass has 2 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Kuga scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |