Jeep Compass 2017 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 77 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 79 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 13.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 15.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 6.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Compass over 15,000 km in a year you can save 975 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.85 m | |
| Jeep Compass and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 458 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1251 litres | 1790 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 539 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`087 kg | 2`665 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`549 kg | 2`035 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 538 kg | 630 kg | |
| Jeep Compass load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |