Jeep Compass 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Compass engine produces 20 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Compass consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Compass consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Compass is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Compass is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Compass has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Jeep Compass uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |