Jeep Compass 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, but torque is 26 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Due to the lower power, Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Compass consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Compass could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.56 m | |
| Jeep Compass and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1251 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Jeep Compass has 28 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 155 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`087 kg | 1`965 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`549 kg | 1`391 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 538 kg | 574 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |