Jeep Compass 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Jeep Compass) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Compass engine produces 10 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, but torque is 10 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Jeep Compass reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 14.60 $ | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Jeep Compass has 4x4: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1251 litres | 1383 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Jeep Compass has 133 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Compass is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Jeep Compass can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`087 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Compass has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |